If your work is choosing between plausible options, you already think in branches.
Seven kinds of people run their thinking through GPTree. Same loop, different jobs. Every scenario below is documented in the field guide, not invented for this page.
Debug without losing context
Branch at the last good message, run three candidate fixes in parallel, and diff models on real code. Dead ends become the review record.
The developer workflow02 · ResearchersHold hypotheses apart
One branch per hypothesis off a shared anchor, literature on the tree instead of in tabs, and honest verdicts when the evidence is thin.
The research workflow03 · WritersFind the voice, keep the drafts
Branch a paragraph into three voices, run parallel drafts, and merge back the winning lines without losing a word that worked.
The writing workflowSide conversations that don't get confused
Ask side questions without derailing the chat, see two answers next to each other before trusting one, and let routines handle the repeat work with your approval.
The everyday workflowA clean room per client
Projects with scoped memory keep client contexts separate; share links and exports ship the result without shipping the mess.
The client workflow05 · TeamsDecide in branches, not meetings
Each teammate argues one option in their own branch, then the Merge Board turns the field into a recommendation with reasons attached.
The team workflow06 · OperatorsA briefing that builds itself
A routine reads your connected tools every morning and posts the brief before you sit down, escalating only what needs a human.
The operator workflowOne loop, many jobs.
Every workflow above is the same three moves. Branch to keep alternatives honest and separate. Compare to make the disagreement readable. Merge to leave with one answer and a record of why.
Never re-explain yourself.
Start free in under a minute. No card required. Use built-in credits or bring your own keys.